Conference of the Parties

COP 27 in Egypt

COP 27 will be hosted in Sharm El-Sheikh (Egypt) from 6 to 18 November. As the event will mark the 30th anniversary of the adoption of the UNFCCC, the Egyptian Presidency is seeking to reaffirm the commitment to the global climate agenda despite the most recent international uncertainties. Crucial items for negotiations will remain adaptation, mitigation and the transformation towards sustainability. Parties will continue to work to define a “new collective quantified goal” for climate finance which will replace the current finance goal of USD 100 billion annually from 2020-2025. In its programme, the Egyptian Presidency announced to be keen on ensuring that COP sessions provide a space for serious interaction and engagement with all stakeholders.

COP 26 Glasglow

The COP26 2020 was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For this reason, the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26) has taken place on 1 – 12 November 2021, hosted by the UK and in partnership with the Italian Government, at the Scottish Event Campus (SEC) in Glasgow. The overarching principle of the upcoming negotiations will be “maximising progress and minimizing delay”. Therefore, the COP26 Presidency had the ambition to drive progress on climate finance and further advancements in the operationalisation of Art. 6 of the Paris Agreement, backed by a new IPCC Report (August 2021) providing a new estimate of the probability of exceeding 1.5°C in the next decades.

COP 25 Madrid

The COP 25 took place from the 2nd to the 13th of December, 2019 in Madrid, Spain. Initially, the 25th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties was meant to be held in Santiago, Chile. The UN climate conference drew 20,000 experts to Madrid.

COP 24 Katowice

COP 24, held in Katowice between the 2nd and 15th of December 2018, was aimed at setting the implementation rules Paris Agreement achieved during COP 21 in 2015 and shaping a joint global climate policy

The decisions comprise the ‘rulebook’ of the Paris Agreement, providing its operational interpretation and top-down direction to complement the bottom-up approach of ‘nationally determined contributions’ (NDCs).

Additionally, the Katowice Climate Package sets out:

  • A regime for transparency and accountability, with common rules for measuring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions, finance and adaptation;
  • Defines processes for the five-yearly global stocktake of the effectiveness of climate action, which includes information – gathering, a technical assessment and a consideration of the outputs; and
  • Establishes a committee to review non – performance of parties (such as failure to submit NDCs or rep orts or not acting on technical reviews), with the consent of the concerned party.

However, no agreement could be reached on some difficult questions such as a pathway to scale up the existing commitments on cutting emissions, the financing of poor countries’ related activities, wording to prevent double counting and precise criteria to identifying whether countries are doing enough to cut their emissions.

Read the Statement by Energy Intensive Industries on the motion for a resolution of the European Parliament on the 2018 UN Climate Change Conference in Katowice, Poland (COP24)

COP 21 Paris – The cornerstone of the international climate engagement

The COP21 meeting which took place in Paris from the end of November till early December 2015, was aimed at reaching a global climate agreement.

It is only one day after the official end date that the 196 countries present at the conference were able to find an agreement aiming at limiting global warming to “well below 2℃ above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5℃”.  Europe’s leadership was instrumental to overcome substantial diverging interests and views among countries participating in the UN’s COP21 meeting in Paris in 2015. As a result, the conference agreed on an ambitious target to limit global temperature rises and a binding commitment to submit national plans for ever-greater reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. From now, the EU refining industry needs a framework in which it can show how to satisfy the growing global demand for energy while at the same time limiting GHG emissions. This is one of the most critical challenges of our time.

The EU negotiators’ team should be commended for their efforts to help other countries develop comparable regulatory tools. Further efforts will be needed to ensure that this will lead to effective global action and equitable commitments from all parties of the agreement, leading in turn to the establishment of a competitive level playing field among world economies.

The international efforts to address the risks of climate change are of course supported by FuelsEurope the European refiners which it represents. These are uniquely qualified to contribute to these efforts, however, they can only do so on a competitive level playing field.

Maintaining Refining operations in the EU will contribute to reducing GHG emissions

The best way to minimise global GHG emissions, given the continuing need for oil products in Europe, is to manufacture them in the EU. By contrast, an increasing dependency of EU consumers on non-EU refineries implies a weakening of the efforts to reduce global warming.

So it is essential that EU energy and environment policies be considered in a global context. If regulations continue to force up the relative cost of refining oil in the EU, European refiners could lose further market shares. The result would be more imports of refined products, meaning that a greater proportion would be produced in facilities that are less energy-efficient than those in the EU. This would constitute carbon leakage and defeat the purpose of the EU policies.

FuelsEurope, therefore, calls for efforts to ensure that the COP21 agreement will lead to equitable commitments from all parties to the agreement and a level playing field for the industry worldwide.

Revenue-neutral market-based mechanisms, including carbon pricing under the right circumstances, are a more economically efficient way to drive the reduction of GHG emissions than industry-specific regulation, technology mandates or performance standards.

There should also be a universal regime for monitoring, reporting and verification. Until the main economies have effectively engaged in similar climate policies to the EU, carbon leakage protection should be introduced to help EU industries that are exposed to unbalanced international competition.