The revision of the Energy Taxation Directive is key to achieve the EU’s increased emissions reduction ambition. We welcome the current revision proposal included in the Fit for 55 Package for a taxation based on the climate impact of fuels and energy. It needs however to ensure a better harmonisation among Member States of taxation rules and levels, necessary to safeguard a well-functioning single market. Key regulatory measures are needed to help the development and deployment of low-carbon liquid fuels, one of which relates to the taxation of fuels and energies. We support a reform of fuel and energy taxation as enabler for very low or zero taxation for low-carbon fuels and energies and to ensure a level playing field for all energy sources.
We understand that taxation rates could be different for fuels and energies as function of their use as transport, heating or industrial energy source but is of the opinion that the taxation calculation base should be uniform for all their uses. In the heating sector, taxation rates could be lower based on social considerations.
Read our Fit for 55 recommendations here.
Read our consultation response on the Energy Taxation Directive here.
Read the joint letter on the recast of the Energy Taxation Directive here.
Taxation can provide strong market signals for the development of low-carbon fuels. Currently all liquid fuels for a certain purpose or a specific sector are taxed at a similar level, regardless of carbon intensity. Zero or very low tax for low-carbon liquid fuels would facilitate fuel pricing that is both socially acceptable, and able to contribute to a business case for investments.
Road transport fuels are a crucial lead market for the timely development and scale-up of low-carbon technologies. Since this sector has already a well-developed excise taxation base, it is also a lead market to initiate the shift from an excise volume-based taxation a combination of a ranking methodology linked to the environmental performance of the fuel as this principle would provide a similar/ equivalent benefit as to a taxation primarily, or fully based on the emitted combustion CO2.
The point of consumption is considered as the point where currently excise tax becomes due. This is at the moment products are removed from the EU excise warehouse system and are supplied to a non-exempt destination (such as a retail station), which is the point of supply to the market, or any point of obligation that the Member State selects as being representative for the final consumption.
We welcome a maximum mandatory tax exemption for the sustainable alternative fuels (10 years), calling for extension in case of issues with their availability.
- Any exemption period should be linked to the availability and the price competiveness of sustainable alternative fuels. The revised ETD should envisage an extension of the exemption period in case the availability or competiveness of the alternative fuels would be an issue;
- We believe that in order to reduce any complicated argumentation toward the application of State Aid Rules mandatory exemption should be maximised, leading to a more harmonised implementation.
This would be necessary to avoid that certain exemptions for sustainable alternative fuels are mandatory in certain transport sectors, while in others are left to the discretion of Member States. Ideally, the exemption should be of 10 years for all Sustainable alternative fuels in all sectors, in particular for road transport fuels.
In view of introducing a taxation on aviation fuel, we believe that following elements should be taken into consideration:
- The aviation fuel taxation should only be applied for all intra-EU flights with a review to include international aviation at a later stage;
- The aviation fuel taxation should be coherent with the taxation base of road transport fuel and energy taxation;
- The mandatory exemption on taxation should be changed into a mandatory application. Exemptions should still be allowed but in exceptional cases and after formal approval by the Commission.
Aviation ticket taxation based on CO2 does not seem be an adequate way to provide incentives for the development and deployment of the sustainable aviation fuels as it is not addressing the main players in the delivery or use of sustainable aviation fuels. It is not necessarily proportional to the CO2-emissions and has a much bigger impact on low cost fares compared to higher cost fares.
In order to introduce maritime fuel taxation, we believe that following elements should be taken into consideration:
- The maritime fuel taxation should be coherent with the taxation base of road transport fuel and energy;
- The mandatory exemption of taxation of maritime fuels in Community waters should be changed into a mandatory application. Exemptions should still be allowed in exceptional cases and after formal approval by the Commission;
- Particular measures should be foreseen to avoid bunkering outside the EU as mean to circumvent EU marine fuel taxation. The risk for bunkering is much higher for maritime transport compared to the risk of tankering for aviation due the flexibility in navigation for maritime transport.
In order to review the taxation on heating fuels and energies, we believe that the following elements should be taken into consideration:
- The taxation on heating fuels and energies should be coherent with the taxation base of road transport fuel and energy;
- Exemptions or use of lower taxation rates should be allowed when due to specific regional conditions there is a lack in the availability of alternative fuels/energies for heating purposes or for social considerations.
FuelsEurope welcomes the review of the Energy Taxation Directive as an opportunity to harmonise the way in which several clauses are handled under the current Energy Taxation Directive. They lead to distortion of competition among companies located in different Member States and contribute to the fragmentation of the internal market.
In order to avoid double taxation, fuels and/or energies used in the manufacturing and in the logistics chain, should be exempted when used as energy source. Therefore, we praised the provisions maintained in under article 2, article 21(3) and article 17 of the Energy Taxation Directive as unchanged.